- 01Everyone in my space runs “guaranteed rank” ads. Why won't you?
- Because those are exactly the claims ASCI has cracked down on across edtech, and the Consumer Protection Act treats a guaranteed rank, score, selection, placement, or admission as a misleading advertisement. One complaint takes the post down and damages the only thing you actually sell — trust. We win the same students a different way: by proving you make hard things click. Myth-bust the misconception, show the analogy that lands, share an honest student journey. SENTINEL blocks the over-promise before you ever see the draft, and a reviewer who knows edtech scrutiny clears anything ambiguous.
- 02Can I still share student success stories and toppers?
- Yes — and they're some of your strongest content, when framed correctly. We tell one student's real journey: where they started, what we rebuilt, where they ended up — as their story, never as an implied promise to the next learner. What we won't do is convert that into “you will get the same result,” a guaranteed-rank claim, or a results-rate you can't substantiate. The line is between honest proof and an implied guarantee, and we keep you firmly on the proof side.
- 03Most of my enquiries come from parents, not students. Can the content speak to them?
- That buyer-split is built into how we work. The learner has to want it, but the parent (or, for corporate training, the L&D head) often decides — so we run distinct streams. Learner-facing content earns the “this person finally makes it make sense” feeling. Parent- and L&D-facing pieces speak to foundations, structure, rigour, and outcomes — honestly, without a guaranteed number. During onboarding we map who actually decides for your audience and what convinces them, and the messaging follows.
- 04Will the content actually sound like me, or like a generic study-tips account?
- This is the part we obsess over. Your onboarding captures how you actually explain things — your signature analogy (the crowded-lift SN1/SN2, the curly-arrow shortcut), the phrases students quote back to you (“don't memorise it, derive it”), your contrarian take on how your subject is wrongly taught. PSYCHE writes against that profile and HUMAN protects it from being flattened into a textbook line. By month two most clients approve 85%+ of pieces, because the system has converged on the way you talk at the whiteboard — not a stock template.
- 05I'm an edtech founder / run an academy with multiple teachers. Does this fit?
- Yes. On the Custom tier we run multiple faculty content streams under one institutional brand — each teacher keeps their own voice and signature explainers while the academy keeps a consistent brand line and a single approval workflow. We map your offering ladder (free shorts → mini-course → live batch → mentorship), align content to your launch and admissions calendar, and add any internal sign-off you need as a gate before publication.
- 06What if I want to publish a strong opinion on how my subject is taught?
- Please do — conviction is what makes education content shareable instead of another tips carousel. Arguing that coaching culture optimises for cramming, that speed-running the syllabus produces students who understand nothing, that foundations beat shortcuts — all of that is exactly the contrarian material we build manifesto pieces on. The one line we hold is no naming or mocking specific rival teachers or centres; we critique the method, never the person. The conviction stays sharp; the attack stays off.